A Florida mayoral candidate’s racist tirade went viral after he told a group of activists to “go back to Africa” during a mayoral forum in2017. According to local reporting, Long-shot St. Petersburg mayoral candidate Paul Congemi made the comments while addressing rival Jesse Nevel, a white supporter of the socialist Uhuru Movement, which seeks slavery reparations for African-Americans. “Mr. Nevel, you and your people, you talk about reparations,” Congemi said, according to video of the outburst. “The reparations that you talk about, Mr. Nevel, your people already got your reparations. Your reparations came in the form of a man named Barack Obama.”
This disgusting piece of germ-infested fecal matter epitomizes the fact that racism is a degeneracy of the mind. A sick and endemic level of low self-esteem which causes the victim to feel good about himself only by debasing others. It is a disease which attacks the intellect, or should I say it is a disease which finds fertile ground in nonintellectual brain-space. That space is usually found in Caucasians, the last race to emerge into the light of civilization. Someone ought to give this imbecile a few classes in real history, not the (his-story )they have concocted and perpetuated over the last several hundred years. One which once again is in and of itself a clear sign of their low self-esteem and lack of elevated intellectual maturity. Lies, false statements, misinformation all intended to feel good about themselves, at the expense of others. Their ascendancy into the light of civilization has been the bane of humanity. Their contribution has been death, theft, murder, and war across the globe. They have taken simple creations like gunpowder created by the Chinese, and weaponized it into a weapon of mass destruction. They are the only ones to have used an atom bomb to kill millions of brown people despite the fact that both the first and second world wars were started by them, Caucasian Germans.
Should I go on, or has this inbred been educated enough? Oh, by the way when they came here our ancestors were long here, three hundred years before they arrived. We had traveled to India, Australia, and places they never dreamed existed. They thought the Earth was flat, these imbeciles believed they would fall off the edge of the earth if they ventured too far away from their European caves. [Christopher Come-Rob-us] wrote about it in his journal. He thought when he arrived in the Islands he had landed in India. The fool was lost, hence his naming it the [west indies]. Nevertheless, their criminal intent was immediately evident, they decidedly laid claim to places they arrived at, where they were greeted and welcomed with kindness. Unfortunately, the hospitality and generosity of brown and Black people would be repaid with barbarism, inhumanity, deception, and savagery. From the Caribbean Islands to the tip of South America all the way to the shores of Africa the ancestors of savages like the one above, demonstrated that they cannot be tamed and should never be trusted. They have honored no hand of friendship, respected no outstretched hand of kindness. They have honored no treaty or agreement to which they have attacked their John Hancock.
There needs to be an education campaign for these inbred low IQ former cave dwellers. But before that happens we as a people must first know who the hell we are.
Have you ever stopped to think about the crass hypocrisy of those serpents who decry the police for what they call ‘extra-judicial killings”? While they surreptitiously remain deathly silent about the “myriad killings in our country”. Not that we can allow our police tokill whomever they want, that is totally unacceptable, but our police should never fear getting investigated and imprisoned for doing their job. We expect and ask our police to go out and enforce our laws so that we can feel safe and secure in our homes and in public spaces. The truth of the matter is that the mechanics of that are not always pretty or palatable to digest, simply put it is not pretty to watch sometimes. As a young CIB officer, I went to Maddens funeral home at the request of my Sub-officer in charge of Crime, Detective Sergeant Wallace to observe a post-mortem examination. I had done this several times before as a young investigator. This time the victim was a young man who was stabbed in the neck area and had died. The killing happened in the White Hall Avenue area of Kingston 8. The victim had not bled much, so there was an expectation that when his corpse was cut open there would be a significant amount of blood inside. Even armed with that expectation, I was totally unprepared for the ghastly sight of the semi-congealed blood which gushed out of that young man’s corpse when the porters opened it up. A wave of nausea washed over me instantly and I dashed out of the building and vomited up everything that was inside me.
Dealing with the dirt and grime of law-enforcement can be gruesome and unsavory, we send soldiers to war and we expect them to win. In times past, losing meant being taken into slavery or killed, so everything rode on winning. Corrections officers have to be tough as nails, because it is their job to deal with individuals we do not want to be roaming around in our communities. It is that same mindset which must be attached to the process of law enforcement. Unfortunately for us, we remain stuck in the nonsensical belief that a person who has some medical training is capable of flying airplanes. We believe that college professors who are politicians will make great ministers of finance. In other words, having an undergraduate degree or even a graduate degree or two automatically qualifies the degree holder to do any and everything. That is the reason that Peter Bunting a Banker was made National Security Minister. The earthy and unpredictable Robert Montaque an agronomist, was also given the same job, and today we have a medical doctor in that office. Using that same logic I suggest that when Chang is done at National security he be given the job to fly airplanes. It is that stupid and regressive thinking which has gotten us into this mess, but most of all it is our propensity for talking shit, when we have no idea what we are talking about.
Sure, we have had bad police shootings in our country, as have every other country in which there is poverty, drugs, lack of opportunities and lots of guns and ammunition. That is not to say we are okay with them, but we understand that they occur. What is been done with the data on police-related shootings is a duplicitous conflation of the numbers in order to advance a certain point of view, to shape policy and to empower and legitimize outsiders who would interfere in our country’s affairs. It is instructive to consider that they do not put chains or restraints on their law enforcement officials and they damn sure do not tolerate violence in their own societies. By virtue of them conflating every police-related shooting into a bad shooting, every police-related killing became an “extra-judicial killing.“ Remember my initial point about people trained in one discipline being viewed as know it all? Well then, you have Carolyn Gomez a baby doctor, Susan Goffe [a know-nothing loudmouth], Horace Levy another loudmouth who argued criminal gangs, were [corner-crews]sic, in order to discredit the police’s version of events. Now, these tools could have cried in their soup all they wanted without consequence, if there was strong leadership in Jamaica House. But we did not, we had Bruce Golding a weak power hungry tool who ran away from the labor party to form the National Democratic Movement only to fail and run back to the Labor party and Edward Seaga with his tail between his legs. Yes, that same Bruce Golding who refused to extradite Christopher [Duddus] Coke to face justice in the United States for his crimes. Rather than look at the data and stand up for the police department which had been decimated by the weak and feckless failure Percival Patterson, Golding gave over the country to Carolyn Gomez and Jamaicans for Justice.
Rather than commence a program of repairing the ramshackle police stations, providing computers to the police so that critical data can be uploaded in the fight against the Island’s equipped criminals , and rather than paying the police better and providing them with more of the tools they needed, including legislative tools, Bruce Golding was too busy defending Duddus Coke. Bruce Golding admitted to hiring Manatt, Phelps & Phillips to lobby Washington for a favorable outcome in the contentious ‘Dudus’ extradition drama, according to the Observer. Golding had previously lied to the nation’s parliament in 2010 when questioned by the Opposition’s Peter Phillips about the incident. In the end, Bruce Golding was forced to fess up to hiring the law firm, but even then he managed to couch his dastardly actions by stating that the payment came from the JLP rather than the Government. So for Bruce Golding, it was okay for the Jamaica Labor Party to pay a foreign law firm to lobby for a favorable outcome for a gun running drug lord, while the police had no tools to do their jobs.
Said Bruce Golding.….
“I SANCTIONEDTHEINITIATIVE, KNOWINGTHATSUCHINTERVENTIONSHAVEINTHEPASTPROVENTOBEOFCONSIDERABLEVALUEINDEALINGWITHISSUESINVOLVINGTHEGOVERNMENTSOFBOTHCOUNTRIES. I MADEITCLEAR, HOWEVER, THATTHISWASANINITIATIVETOBEUNDERTAKENBYTHEPARTY, NOTBYORONBEHALFOFTHEGOVERNMENT,” GOLDINGSAIDYESTERDAY. “A PAYMENTOFUS$49,892.62 WASMADETOMANATT, PHELPS&PHILLIPSONSEPTEMBER18TH 2009. THESEFUNDSWERESOURCEDFROMFINANCIALCONTRIBUTORSTOTHEPARTY. RUMORSANDSPECULATIONCARRIEDINTHEMEDIATHATTHESEFUNDSWEREPROVIDEDBYCHRISTOPHERCOKEARECOMPLETELYFALSEASTHEPARTYISFULLYAWAREOFTHESOURCEOFTHESEFUNDS,” HEADDED. PRIMEMINISTERGOLDINGFURTHERINSISTEDTHATTHEREWAS “ABSOLUTELYNOTHINGILLEGALLYORSURREPTITIOUS” ABOUTWHATHADBEENDONE, ARGUINGTHATTHEENGAGEMENTOFLOBBYISTSTOACTONBEHALFOFFOREIGNGOVERNMENTS, POLITICALPARTIESORCORPORATIONSIS A WELL-KNOWNPRACTICEINTHEUNITEDSTATESGOVERNEDBYLAW. SOURCE: CARIBBEAN 360
Today, Bruce Golding’s creation, INDECOM , has been proven a dismal failure. The agency lies and influences manufactured witnesses to give false affidavits and to lie under oath in order to convict police officers for crimes they did not commit, all to pad arrest and conviction numbers. Those numbers are not arrests of criminals, they are the false arrest of police officers who go out to protect the country for the most part. INDECOM has not earned it keeps, but it has surely resulted in an increase in violent crimes as the Island’s murderers are no longer afraid of the police coming after them. Yet in 2018 the Jamaican taxpayers coughed up in excess of $353.35 million Jamaican dollars to fund that money sucking dark hole.. The rest of the funding comes from even darker corners of the International community, with interests which do not line up with a prosperous Jamaica. As one of my friends wrote in response to one of our articles recently, well why not let him tell it?
Until the police are given a state mandate to fight and push back crime we are beating a dead horse here. A country with 2.8million people should never be so crime-prone with all the cultural and psychological amenities available for just about everybody. With so much oversight groups created to oversee such a small police force in fighting crime against some of the most vicious criminals on the planet is egregious,the millions of dollars allotted to finance unessential agencies like Indecom is a total waste of government funds, instead such monies would be wiser spent on health care, education and equipping the security forces better to deal with crime and violence. It has been costing the health care system in Jamaica an astronomical amount of money annually just to deal with everyday trauma cases at hospitals across the country just to treat people with gunshot wounds derived from criminal shootings which clearly underscores my plea to cut funding for Indecom drastically and reallocate the money to the hospitals around the country. The amount of wanton killings and shooting of innocent Jamaicans far outnumbers the number of questionable shootings alleged to have done by our security forces,the time is now to repeal or abandon the Indecom act and release the shackles from our men and women in uniform to go out and face the killing machine which is the crime monster. Hamish Campbell needs to be sent packing back to England where he belongs and to the country which started our social woes in the first place. As for big mouth Williams,he needs to go and set up shop for a law practice which he went to school for and get paid from the criminals and gunmen which he is so obsessed with for him to defend them in courts of law in the country and stop freeloading off a system which is struggling to finance it’s security forces efficiently to fight crime in a crime-ridden bastion in the Caribbean called Jamaica . (LS)
Mike Beckles is a former Jamaican police corporal, business owner, avid researcher, and blogger. He is also a black achiever honoree, and publisher of the blog chatt-a-box.com. You may subscribe to his blogs free of charge.
“Can we please start the impeachment process now?” Rashida Tlaib asked a month before she was sworn in as the representative from Michigan’s 13th congressional district. It was the right question at the right time — a moment in December when President Trump was casually announcing: “I will shut down the government.” And Tlaib was the right person to ask it: a lawyer with a firm grasp of the Constitution and deep regard for the oath she was about to swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.”
Yet, Tlaib got only a little notice when she spoke up in December. She got more attention in January when, after being sworn in, she employed some salty language in an enthusiastic declaration. of her determination to hold the president to account. Trump labeled her “disgraceful” and “highly disrespectful to the United States of America.” But Tlaib was undeterred. She consulted with experts on the system of checks and balances and advanced a proposal rooted in a savvy recognition of the fact that impeachment is a process. Now, as political and media figures who once eschewed discussions of the “I” word are suddenly talking about nothing else, it is time to recognize the wisdom of Tlaib’s proposal.
Trump is rejecting the system of checks and balances. He is abusing his executive authority in an effort to thwart congressional review of the full Mueller report, and his attorney general has refused to coöperate with the House Judiciary Committee. The Democratic majority on the committee has taken necessary and appropriate action, voting last Wednesday to recommend that the full House hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt of Congress for refusing to share the unredacted report from special counsel Robert Mueller III with the committee. Yet, Barr is still refusing to coöperate. And what of Trump? Committee chair Jerry Nadler (D‑NY) says, “the President is disobeying the law, is refusing all information to Congress.” “The phrase constitutional crisis has been overused…” says Nadler, “but, certainly, it’s a constitutional crisis, although I don’t like to use that phrase because it’s been used for far less dangerous situations.”
This is a dangerous situation and its should be addressed with the response that the founders of the American experiment identified. “If we do not engage in the impeachment process, we set a dangerous precedent for all future presidents — that they can defy the law and trample on our constitution, taking us on the road to autocracy,” saysFree Speech for People’s John Bonifaz, a lawyer who has working with Tlaib on accountability issues. The key word is “process.” Before formal articles of impeachment are written and voted on by the House, information must be gathered, hearings must be held, efforts must be made to provide the American people with a full sense of why accountability is necessary, and outreach must be made to those constitutionally-inclined Republicans who might recognize the danger of allowing a president — even a president with an “R” after his name — to dismiss checks and balances and disregard the rule of law. This process of applying the cure for a constitutional crisis, as established by the founders of the American experiment, moves the discussion of accountability toward concrete reality.Tlaib is proposing to begin the process with legislation resolving that:
(1) the Committee on the Judiciary shall inquire whether the House of Representatives should impeach Donald John Trump, President of the United States of America;
(2) the Committee on the Judiciary or any subcommittee or task force designated by the Committee may, in connection with the inquiry under this resolution, take affidavits and depositions by a member, counsel, or consultant of the Committee, pursuant to notice or subpoena; and
(3) there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives such sums as may be necessary to assist the Committee on the Judiciary in conducting the inquiry under this resolution, any of which may be used for the procurement of staff or consultant services.
Tlaib’s proposal is on point. Her resolution does not outline specific articles of impeachment. It simply signals that the time has come to begin the necessary process. It is this process that will identify the offenses that might form the basis for articles the Judiciary Committee and the House could consider.While many in Congress remain cautious, the American people understand the wisdom of Tlaib’s proposal. Last week, she and Congressman Al Green, the Texas Democrat who has been a stalwart champion of presidential accountability, accepted a flash drive containing 10 million signatures on digital petitions calling for an impeachment inquiry. MoveOn, CREDO Mobile, Need to Impeach, Women’s March, By the People, Change.org, Democracy for America, and Free Speech for People have supported the call, which will be amplified this week by activists in DC and nationwide. “Ten million people said that we need to hold this president accountable. I think that speaks volumes,” says Rashida Tlaib. “Ten million people want us to uphold the United States Constitution.”